Audit Reports
Indirect Tax
Report No. 29 of 2014 - Performance Audit on Administration of Prosecution and Penalties in Central Excise and Service Tax of Union Government, Department of Revenue - Indirect Taxes, Central Excise and Service Tax
Overview
Prosecution is the commencement of a criminal proceeding, where the Government exhibits before a Court of Law the formal charges against a person accused of an offense and seeks to impose on such person a suitable punishment and penalty. Thus, in Central Excise, prosecution sets in motion a legal process by which Government seeks to ensure punishment of companies and persons concerned with evasion of Central Excise duty. A performance audit was conducted to seek an assurance that the systems and procedures relating to prosecution and penalty were adequate and adhered to by the Central Board of Excise and Customs.Eleven cases from 5 Commissionerates involving meagre amount of RS 1.82 lakh are under prosecution in various Courts for periods exceeding 30 years.
Audit could not identify the pendency period in 43 prosecution cases having a revenue implication of RS 31.50 crore as department was not able to provide details of date of filing of complaint. In 138 prosecution cases in 27 Commissionerates, the sending of investigation reports suffered delays ranging from a month to over 10 years to obtain the mandatory sanction of the Chief Commissioner to launch prosecution. In 61 cases under 12 Commissionerates and in four cases under DGCEI Mumbai Audit could not verify whether the investigation reports were submitted within the stipulated time or not due to non-availability of records in the concerned files.
In 175 cases relating to 37 Commissionerates and DGCEI, Delhi there was delay of a month to 15 years in filing complaints with the Courts of Law. Out of 46 selected Commissionerates, 30 Commissionerates reported that they are not doing any review on pending prosecution cases. Instances of delay in Court proceeding due lack of proper attention by the departmental officers were noticed. In 19 cases where prosecution was initiated, none of the accused persons had been informed separately in writing about the offer of compounding.
Download Audit Report
-
Report No. 29 of 2014 - Full Report (0.40 MB) Download
-
Index (0.13 MB) Download
-
Preface (0.12 MB) Download
-
Executive Summary (0.14 MB) Download
-
Chapter 1 - Introduction (0.21 MB) Download
-
Chapter 2 - Administration of Prosecution and Penalty (0.33 MB) Download
-
Abbreviations (0.12 MB) Download